The optimization of energy consumption and the associated
reduction of CO2 emissions are top priorities for our society in
the 21st century. In addition, the world’s resources are finite
which is why it is important to search for opportunities to use
them as efficiently as possible. The governmental regulation of
emissions standards for vehicles in particular has led to a
paradigm change resulting in the promotion of innovative
concepts for light construction. Despite global efforts to
reduce the use of non-renewable energy, the worldwide demand for
individual mobility has been unrelenting. Independent studies of
trends and markets conducted by well-known automobile
manufacturers and research institutes have shown this to be
true. Optimistic predictions talk about a doubling of production
volume for automobiles within the next 20 years, whereby the
classic drive technologies will be replaced with new,
future-oriented technologies. Regardless, an increased use of
light and highly resilient materials is to be expected. Aluminum
and magnesium will play a crucial role in this.
With the demand for efficiency and sustainability, diecasters
have encountered new and recently yet unknown challenges, not
least of which is to master the diecasting process and ensure
the required level of quality. An overall trend is moving toward
more complex components with increased functionality and lower
weight at lower costs.
In addition to substituting heavy materials such as steel with
lighter metals, the use of structural components contributes to
reducing the weight of automobiles. This makes it possible to
effectively reduce fuel consumption and, as a result, CO2
emissions. However, vehicles running on gasoline or diesel are
not the only ones to benefit from lighter construction. Electric
or hybrid vehicles also benefit: batteries and additional drive
elements such as electric motors increase the weight. This can
be compensated for by the strict use of light construction for
the bodies of the vehicles. Structural components made of die
cast aluminum provide additional options. They play an
ever-increasing key role in the construction of new vehicles now
and in the future.
Difficult Challenges

The requirements placed on such components are high:
particularly in the area of support structures and vehicle
bodies, they have to withstand highly dynamic stresses and meet
the strict requirements of the vehicle manufacturers in terms of
crash safety and joining technology. This requires a consistent,
high-level uniform process to be implemented. Only then can the
good mechanical properties be reliably maintained. In addition,
structural components must be easy to weld, clinch and bond.
Despite strict requirements of the automotive industry,
production must be cost-efficient. This means the entire
diecasting process chain must be carried out and monitored
within narrow boundaries—from the selection and handling of the
melt through die design and casting technology to clear labeling
of each individual casting.
The Right Process, the Right Plant Engineering
Structural components unify the function of many metal component
parts, thereby reducing the complexity required for body
construction. By integrating many components into a single
casting, they continue to become larger and more complex. In
order to minimize their weight, wall thicknesses have been
reduced from the 2.5-3 mm range to less than 2 mm and are only
reinforced according to local requirements. In order to ensure
reliable production of such components, having the right process
run on machines and systems designed for that process is
critical.
Thinner wall thicknesses call for shorter die filling times;
even larger castings with long flow paths for the molten metal
require very accurately dimensioned locking units. In order to
fulfill these tasks, very efficient and highly dynamic shot ends
with little scattering of the process parameters are required.
Hydraulic clamping cylinders directly on the tie-bars allow for
each tie-bar to be clamped individually and therefore promote
homogenous distribution of the locking force. This results in
little flashing or need for post-processing. In addition, the
unique control of the casting process in real-time ensures an
extraordinarily high degree of reproducibility over the entire
production process.
Air-Tight and Free of Turbulence
To achieve the low vacuum in the cavity that determines the
component properties in diecasting, properly designed dies and
high-performance die vacuum technology are required. Wear
resistance and thermal insulation of the shot sleeve are
crucial: they guarantee the tightness of the vacuum system
between the shot sleeve and the plunger and reduce the heat loss
of the molten metal in the shot sleeve. Turbulence must be
reduced for ladling metal from the dosing furnace to ensure the
molten metal in the shot sleeve is low in oxide and hydrogen and
ready for the next die filling process.
Precision in Post-Processing
In addition to how the material is molten and die cast,
post-processing, thermal treatment and logistics of the
components must also be taken into consideration. Errors made
when the die releasing agent is applied could increase porosity
due to gas which would have a negative effect on the quality of
the weld. For this reason, there is a clear trend for such
castings toward using a minimum of die releasing agent when
spraying. However, this requires the temperature control concept
be adjusted for the die inserts in order to dissipate the
process energy efficiently.
The ejection and extraction of the castings in particular and
the subsequent cooling has a significant effect on warping. The
large-scale dimensions of structural components present a new
challenge for high-volume production: trimming of components in
the die casting cell requires large trimming presses and an
optimized flow of material for the cast part as well as for
recycled materials. A thermal treatment process that is not set
correctly could lead to an increase in rejects during production
since the required mechanical properties cannot be attained in a
reproducible manner.
Keyword: Lost Core

The potential for light construction has been further expanded
with a process that has been advanced by pioneers for years:
lost core technology. The internal design of a casting can be
more complex with geometric undercuts, which allows for a
previously unknown component design and a higher degree of
functional integration. For example, cylinder crankcases with
closed deck construction can take advantage.
In this process, the water jacket is formed with a salt core
that is flushed out later with water under high pressure. The
use of salt cores in a diecasting machine does not pose any
problems since, in contrast to sand cores, they are not abrasive
and do not cause any wear. This is how components from gravity
and sand diecasting can be substituted and produced even more
economically with pressure diecasting: pressure die castings are
near net-shape and require fewer post-processing steps. Another
advantage of the lost core technology is the excellent quality
of the surface of the cast wall by the salt core, comparable to
the roughness of a diecast component. Lost core is particularly
well-suited for manufacturing components for guiding flowing
media, such as water and oil.
Aluminum castings with salt recesses demonstrate very little
flow resistance.
When the salt core that determines the internal shape of the
component is created, the appropriate salt solution and process
parameters play a crucial role. This guarantees the stability of
the core while making it possible to extract the core
subsequently. The diecasting machine manufacturer becomes the
technology partner who supports customers throughout the entire
process, from the initial idea to the production stage, and from
component design for the salt core application to the die and
salt core concept in the die casting process.
Keyword: Improving the Efficient Use of Resources
Special attention must be paid to the use of energy and
materials during diecasting. The die and the gating system play
a crucial role here. The melting and holding processes alone use
between 50 and 70 percent of the energy required for the entire
process. A lot of energy is consumed initially to melt and
overheat the metal to then solidify it in the die shortly
afterwards and cool and extract the casting. The die temperature
control concept plays a critical role in determining the cooling
time and, consequently, the cycle time of the casting process.
The classic surface cooling by spraying with water-soluble die
releasing agents uses up to 50% of the entire cycle—and the same
in terms of energy and resources.
In turn, the design of the shot system is critical for the
amount of material used. Thin-walled castings use the greatest
portion of material for the gating proportionally. The material
must be returned and melted down again, which results in
additional use of energy and, at the same time, loss of material
due to slagging. Cost-effectiveness demands sophisticated gating
concepts that make it possible to substantially reduce the
amount of returns. Consistent optimizing at an early stage of
the concept is key to sustainable, economic success. More
precise and faster filling and solidifying simulations are
created to find the right gating, ventilating and cooling
systems. These methods will grow in importance along with the
practical experience of the caster. In addition to the material
and its solidification and casting properties, post-processing,
thermal treatment and logistics of the components are also taken
into consideration for the overall analysis. Knowledge of the
individual process steps and how they affect costs and function
should be learned through well-founded training. The only way to
prevent costly mistakes is to have well-trained experts.
Keyword: Increasing Productivity

The best indicator of the productivity of a diecasting cell is
uptime and the efficiency of the die casting process, i.e. the
number of castings produced per unit of time. However, how can
we measure this as objectively as possible? The OEE (Overall
Equipment Efficiency) method of measurement was recently
recommended throughout the industry and compares the theoretical
output capacity and actual capacity of the plant. Of particular
interest is the fact that this method of calculation includes
the performance of the entire diecasting cell, i.e. the
diecasting machine and peripherals, while taking into account
the factors of time, velocity and quality in a meaningful and
reliable manner. The reliability and uptime of individual
components is therefore less important for the output capacity
of the diecasting cell. It is much more determined by the
weakest link and the interaction of the individual components
and sub-processes of the production chain. A clear connection
between all components that are relevant to the process is the
key to uninterrupted and cost-efficient production.
The cell control system of current diecasting machines
integrates all the activities of the system peripherals
throughout the process in monitoring and documenting the
process. Interfaces to higher level systems make it possible to
collect, analyze and safeguard all the data in a central
location over the long term. Furthermore, they support the
operator with a sophisticated diagnosis system in optimizing the
entire diecasting process and, therefore, the OEE. The control
system logs important information regarding the operating status
of the machine and its peripheral equipment, and any alarms that
may have been sounded.
These logs should then be used actively for continuous
improvement of the process and for understanding the most common
sources of error. Using specialized software packages, it is
possible to evaluate the data as needed. Downtimes can be
assigned to corresponding alarms, and any process errors can be
identified. This is a key benefit to a diecasting facility: it
can increase the productivity and quality of its process in a
targeted manner while improving profitability.
The challenges of the future for diecasting can be met with new
innovative concepts and consistent implementation, along with
existing expertise. These challenges are a result of
requirements for weight reduction, expanded functionality of
components and improved resource and cost efficiency of the
castings to be produced. Machine concepts and technologies
continuously are being improved. However, as diecasters are
confronted with changing processing conditions, they need to
rethink how they operate. In order to manufacture components of
the highest quality in a cost-efficient manner, all measures
must be coordinated individually to meet the different
requirements of the component to be produced and the particular
production process.
HOME PAGE | CASTING BLOG | CONTACT US |